Summary

In its judgement of 11 July 2024 (C-757/22), the European Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) ruled that the violation of a controller’s information obligations under Art. 12 and 13 GDPR, can be subject to a representative action under Article 80(2) GDPR.

Facts of the case

Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (“

Continue Reading Europe/Germany:  Right to bring collective action for violations of information obligations under GDPR

On August 21, 2024, the second expert committee appointed under the Thai Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of 2019, issued an administrative fine to a major private company involved in online sales. The company allowed a significant amount of personal data to leak to call center gangs without implementing adequate security measures as required by

Continue Reading THAILAND: First PDPA Enforcement in Thailand: A Landmark Case

The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) has welcomed X’s agreement to suspend its processing of certain personal data for the purpose of training its AI chatbot tool, Grok. This comes after the DPC issued suspension proceedings against X in the Irish High Court.  The DPC described this as the first time that any

Continue Reading Ireland: Increased regulatory convergence of AI and data protection: X suspends training of AI chatbot with EU user data after Irish regulator issues High Court proceedings

Hong Kong is following other jurisdictions, including Mainland China, Singapore and the UK, in proposing to enhance cybersecurity obligations on IT systems of those operating critical infrastructure (“CI“). While the proposed new law, tentatively entitled the Protection of Critical Infrastructure (Computer System) Bill (the“proposed legislation”), is still at an early stage

Continue Reading Hong Kong: A Practical Guide to the Proposed Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Legislation

While the definition of sensitive personal information in China has always been different to other jurisdictions, with a focus on risk of harm at its heart, new draft guidance should make it easier for organisations to map their processing of China sensitive personal information, which is increasingly important in light of new cross-border data transfer

Continue Reading China: Important new guidance on defining sensitive personal information

On 1 July 2024, Australia’s spam regulator, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (AMCA), released a Statement of Expectations setting out its requirements for customer consent in the context of direct marketing.

The ACMA has consistently demonstrated a clear intolerance for breaches of the spam requirements, penalising business with over AUD 15 million

Continue Reading Australia’s e-marketing expectations: When customers don’t give a spam

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reiterated its long-held view that hashing or pseudonymizing identifiers does not render data anonymous, in a post to its Technology Blog on July 24, 2024.

In the rather strongly worded post, while acknowledging that hashing and pseudonymizing data has the benefit of obscuring the underlying personal data, the FTC

Continue Reading FTC Reiterates that Hashed and Pseudonymized Data is Still Identifiable Data

On 18th July, the European Supervisory Authorities (“ESAs“) published the final versions of the second batch of their draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) and implementing technical standards (ITS), developed under the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), as well as two sets of Guidelines.

Summary of draft

Continue Reading EU: European Supervisory Authorities issue second batch of technical standards under DORA

This is Part 2 in a series of articles on the European Health Data Space (“EHDS“).  Part 1, which provides a general overview of the EHDS, is available here.

Alongside the better-known provisions of the EHDS dealing with secondary use of health data, the draft Regulation also sets out specific technical requirements

Continue Reading Requirements of EHR systems under the European Health Data Space

The UK has made several consequential amendments to its primary electronic surveillance law, the Investigatory Powers Act (“IPA”). These changes have the potential to impact the development of certain privacy-enhancing services by technology companies, whilst also widening the scope of the government’s access to certain electronic datasets. There is also the possibility of

Continue Reading UK: Changes to UK surveillance and communications law: the Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Act 2024.