In its judgment of May 13, 2025 (case number VI ZR 186/22), the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – “BGH”) continued its case law on the compensability of non-material damages under Article 82 GDPR, in particular with regard to whether the mere loss of control over personal data was sufficient for a
Continue Reading Germany: Further Judgment on Non-Material Damages for Loss of Control over Personal Data
In response to the UK’s new Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUA Act) coming into force, the UK Information Commissioner (ICO) has launched two public consultations. The consultations, which aim to shape final guidance on amendments introduced by the DUA Act, address the new lawful basis of “recognised legitimate interests”
Continue Reading UK: ICO launches consultations on the new Data (Use and Access) Act 2025
On June 26, 2025, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) published two sets of guidelines to help businesses ensure their organizational compliance with the NIS2 Directive.
The aim of the guidelines is to support companies in understanding how legal requirements translate into operational activities, particularly regarding (i) roles and skills for professionals within essential
Continue Reading EU: ENISA Guidelines on Compliance with NIS 2 Directive Published
CrowdStrike’s 2025 Threat Hunting Report offers key insights into the current cyber threat landscape. Drawing on data from July 2024 to June 2025, the report showcases how adversaries are becoming more sophisticated, scalable, and business-like in their operations. These “enterprising adversaries” are not only innovating their tactics but also exploiting emerging technologies such as generative
Continue Reading Key Insights from the CrowdStrike 2025 Threat Hunting Report
In a decision issued on 18 July 2025 against Google LLC, the Personal Data Protection Office (PDPO) has affirmed that the data protection compliance obligations under Ugandan law apply to all entities that handle the personal data of Ugandan citizens, regardless of where they are based.
The office has also clarified that a
Continue Reading Uganda: Data protection Regulator Clarifies Compliance Requirements for Offshore Entities
The Italian Data Protection Authority’s recent decision provided guidance on the true meaning of personal data anonymization and the crucial distinction between the DPO as a monitor – not an executor. In a world driven by AI and public surveillance, both concepts are more relevant than ever.
On April 10, 2025, the Garante issued a
Continue Reading ITALY: Personal data anonymization and the risk of the DPO being an executor
On 8 July 2025, the DIFC Data Protection Law No. 5 of 2020 (DIFC Data Protection Law) was amended to introduce several substantive changes, including the landmark creation of a private right of action for data subjects, clarifications to the extraterritorial scope, and increased financial penalties for non-compliance.
The changes broadly reflect those
Continue Reading Dubai International Financial Centre: Updates to the DIFC Protection Laws
It’s well-known that China’s data protection laws define sensitive personal information very differently to other jurisdictions. Instead of a closed list of data types, sensitive personal information in China has traditionally been defined by reference to a broad “risk of harm” test. A new national standard, which will come into force on 1 November 2025
Continue Reading CHINA: definition and handling of Sensitive Personal Information helpfully clarified
The Irish Supreme Court, on 24 July 2025, issued a landmark decision offering greater clarity on non-material damages in the context of privacy claims under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The judgment in Dillon v Irish Life Assurance plc[1] (Dillon) marks a significant development for both individuals seeking compensation
Continue Reading Ireland: GDPR, PIAB, and the Personal Injury Puzzle – The Irish Supreme Court Decides
The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) has fined a company EUR 420,000 for violating privacy laws in the workplace. The decision focuses on the employer’s use of content from Facebook, WhatsApp, and Messenger— shared from the employee’s personal accounts—for disciplinary purposes.
This ruling will have serious repercussions for any employer operating in Italy, especially those
Continue Reading Italy: Garante issues fine for use of employee’s private chats in disciplinary actions
